I’m sharing a short policy brief that translates the Reality-Aligned Intelligence (RAI) framework into concrete tools for EU AI Act implementation.
The focus: AI systems that present themselves as caring “almost-persons” – tutors, companions, coaches, therapists – while in reality they are statistical models with very different limits and incentives. The brief introduces four simple questions (N/R/OH/A), the Ontological Integrity Line (OIL) and Integrity Zones, and shows how these can make existing provisions on deception, transparency and protection of minors more operational.
I’d be very interested in feedback from policymakers, supervisors and practitioners on whether this framing is useful for guidance, standards and codes of practice around anthropomorphism, affective AI and AI “companions”.
- Etichete
- AI Governance ai regulation blog discussion
- Conectați-vă pentru a adăuga observații
Comentariis