Dear Marina, thank you.

I can imagine why its been not easy to understand my question, sorry for that.

The problem is that in my jurisdiction the concept of Trusted Lists (TL) is fundamentally misunderstood, so the pointer you provide to the TL of my jurisdiction is almos useless - no public service in this jursidition reliy on that TL, instead, every public service or public sector agency have their own a kind of "local trust list" which however officially/legally doesn't exist. So under these unwritten rules, a TSP issuing certificates must arrange individual agreements with each public service or by public service provider. It works like with browsers but the difference is that with browsers you have clearly written policies, requirements etc. Of course, as a first QCA in this jurisdiction we got approval from all those "local trust lists" except one: a government owned enteprise which is both a commercial TSP and operator of many high demand publice services. So in my question I was trying to find out if there exist a reason why the "local trust list" of this chameleon government business should replce its "local trust list" and rely on the official Member State TL. BTW the documents processed in these public services (Legal Entity Register, Real Estate regster etc.) are those defined under Decision 2009/767/EU and  2011/130/EU but as the Directive 93/1999 was not implemented in this country, and the local legislation was not notifief to the Commission, eIDAS doesn't work here since its first application day. Hope this clearifies my question, thanks.